ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEADING SECTOR IMPLEMENTATION IN MAJELIS DAERAH KEDIRI UTARA I

Authors

  • Akde Triyoga STIKES RS Baptis Kediri Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70574/n2rd9t85

Keywords:

Leading Sector, program evaluation, CIPP, GKJW, Majelis Daerah Kediri Utara I

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Leading Sector program using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product). The Leading Sector is a program strategy in which selected congregations with certain potential act as the main implementers, while the District Council (Majelis Daerah) serves as the coordinator. This research employed a quantitative approach with explanatory research design. Data was collected through questionnaires from 93 respondents consisting of PHMJ, BPMJ, and organizing committees from four congregations that had implemented the Leading Sector. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to examine the influence of context, input, and process variables on product. The findings revealed that context, input, and process significantly influenced the product, contributing 51.4% (R² = 0.514). Among these, process was found to be the most dominant factor affecting program success. In general, respondents assessed the aspects of context, input, process, and product as being in the “fair” category. However, improvements are still needed in terms of clarifying program objectives, ensuring equitable funding, strengthening coordination, and encouraging innovation in implementation. In conclusion, the Leading Sector program is considered sufficiently effective and feasible to continue, with necessary improvements particularly in the areas of socialization, funding, and coordination between the District Council and implementing congregations.

References

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan (Ed. 2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Hadi, S. (2015). Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. (Teori eliminasi central tendency effect pada Skala Likert).

Hansmann, H. (2018). The Ownership of Enterprise. Harvard University Press. (Teori keterbatasan dana & keuangan lembaga nirlaba).

Hirschman, A. O. (2019). The Strategy of Economic Development. Yale University Press. (Teori Leading Sector).

Mulyasan, E. (2015). Manajemen Strategi Pengembangan Mutu Organisasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Stoner, J. A. F., Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (2020). Management (6th ed.). Pearson. (Prinsip manajemen program organisasi).

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate Improvement and Accountability. Guilford Publications. (Buku induk teori evaluasi CIPP).

Sudjana, D. (2016). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah: Untuk Pendidikan Nonformal dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. (Rujukan baku metode explanatory, kuantitatif, rumus sampel kuota, dan populasi).

Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2014). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Wholey, J. S., Hatry, H. P., & Newcomer, K. E. (2018). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. John Wiley & Sons. (Teori evaluasi program organisasi non-profit).

.Widoyoko, E. P. (2017). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wirawan. (2016). Evaluasi: Teori, Model, Metodologi, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEADING SECTOR IMPLEMENTATION IN MAJELIS DAERAH KEDIRI UTARA I. (2026). Pedagogic Research-Applied Literacy Journal , 3(3), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.70574/n2rd9t85

Similar Articles

11-20 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.