EXPLORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ERROR ANALYSIS IN IMPROVING GRAMMAR PROFICIENCY

Mukhlisin

doi:10.70574/8cwtd638

Authors

Mukhlisin STAI Miftahul ‘Ula Nganjuk, Kab. Nganjuk Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70574/8cwtd638

Keywords:

Error Analysis, Grammar Proficiency, Language Learning, Pedagogical Strategies

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of error analysis as a pedagogical approach to improving grammar proficiency among Islamic Education students at STAI Miftahul Ula, Nganjuk. Recognizing the persistent challenges students face in mastering grammatical accuracy, this research highlights the need for innovative teaching methods. A mixed-methods design was employed, integrating both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The sample consisted of 60 students selected through purposive sampling, divided into an experimental group using error analysis techniques and a control group employing conventional methods. Data were collected using grammar proficiency tests, reflective journals, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired t-tests, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed. The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in grammar proficiency for the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Key qualitative themes included increased metalinguistic awareness, enhanced engagement, and positive attitudes toward learning grammar. The findings suggest that error analysis fosters a deeper understanding of grammatical rules by allowing students to identify and correct their mistakes. This study fills a gap in the literature by focusing on error analysis within the context of Islamic Education, where grammar is crucial for comprehending classical Arabic texts. Practical implications include integrating error analysis into language curricula and providing teacher training to implement this approach effectively. Future research should explore the long-term impact of error analysis on language retention and extend the study to diverse educational settings. This research not only contributes to the theoretical understanding of error analysis but also offers actionable insights for improving grammar instruction in higher education.

References

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Azar, B. S. (2019). Understanding and using English grammar (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2015). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brown, H. D. (2019). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Chuang, Y. (2020). Peer feedback and learner autonomy in ESL writing: Effects on grammatical accuracy and self-efficacy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100734

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2017). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2019). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S. (2012). The effects of direct written corrective feedback on improvement of grammatical accuracy of high-proficient L2 learners. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n2p49

Ferris, D. R. (2018). Second language writing and error correction: An updated guide. University of Michigan Press.

Ferris, D. R. (2020). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Language Teaching, 52(2), 165–185.

James, C. (2013). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge.

Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer.

Li, S., Wang, A., & Lin, X. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in language learning feedback: Opportunities and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1449–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1896510

Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). Open University Press.

Rahman, F. (2022). The role of error analysis in improving grammar accuracy among Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of Language Education Research, 5(2), 45–58.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). Practice teaching: A reflective approach. Cambridge University Press.

Saeed, M. A., & Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020). Exploring written corrective feedback in ESL contexts: Teachers’ practices and students’ perceptions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n3p49

Sari, D. P., & Rahmawati, A. (2021). Investigating grammar teaching challenges in Islamic higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 101–115.

Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. Language Learning, 60(s2), 4–32

Setiawan, A., & Nurhayati, N. (2021). Error analysis and grammar awareness in Islamic university contexts. Journal of English Pedagogy and Linguistics, 4(3), 200–212.

Yulianti, E. (2020). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in grammar learning among EFL students. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 311–325